Some Aspects of the Interpretation of the Old Testament Prophecies in the New Testament: The View of Theodore of Mopsuestia

Authors

  • Timofeev Boris, archpriest Moscow Theological Academy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31802/GB.2023.50.3.001

Keywords:

Theodore of Mopsuestia, hermeneutics, exegesis, patrology, accommodation, Antioch school, New Testament interpretation, prophecy

Abstract

The New Testament interpretation of the Old Testament prophecies became the basis of the methodology of Christian exegesis of the texts of the Old Testament. Traditionally, the authority of Christ and the apostles has always remained unshakable for interpreters. However, at the end of the 4th century, in the Antiochian exegetical tradition (in the environment of the Alexandrian school, due to the specifics of the allegorical method, this could not happen), a new rational approach to the analysis and valuation of New Testament interpretations of prophetic texts appeared. Theodore of Mopsuestia revises the exegesis of New Testament authors and church tradition. In his works, he sharply raises the question of the correspondence of the New Testament interpretation to the context of the prophetic books. As a result, the exegete raises a set of problems that remain relevant to modern biblical scholarship and patrology in our time.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Timofeev Boris, archpriest, Moscow Theological Academy

Senior Teacher at the Department of Biblical Studies at the Moscow Theological Academy

Holy Trinity-St. Sergius Lavra, Sergiev Posad, 141312, Russia

bortim@mail.ru

 

References

Concilium universale Constantinopolitaum sub Iustiniano habitum. Vol. 1: Consilii Actiones VIII. Appendices Graecae — Indices / ed. J. Straub. Berolini: In aedibus Walter de Gruyter & Co, 1971. (ACO; t. IV, vol. 1).

Ioannes Chrysostomus. Homiliae in epistolam II ad Thessaloniceses // PG. T. 62. Col. 467–500.

Ioannes Chrysostomus. Homiliae in Matthaeum // PG. T. 58. Col. 469–793.

Psalm 8 // Hagiographa Chaldaice / ed. P. de Lagarde. Lipsiae: B. G. Teubneri, 1873. P. 4:23–33.

Psalm 39 // Hagiographa Chaldaice / ed. P. de Lagarde. Lipsiae: B. G. Teubneri, 1873. P. 21:19 — 22:2.

Psalmi // Origenis Hexaplorum: quae supersunt sive veterum interpretum graecorum in totus Vetus Testamentum fragmenta / ed. F. Field. Vol. 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1875. P. 87–305.

Theodorus Mopsuestenus.Commentarius in Amosum // Theodori Mopsuesteni Commentarius in XII prophetas / ed. H. N. Sprenger. Weisbaden: Otto Harassowitz, 1977. (Göttinger Orientforschungen V: Biblica et Patristica; Bd. 1). S. 105–156.

Theodorus Mopsuestenus.Commentarius in euangelium Iohannis apostoli / interpretor J.-M. Vosté. Louvain: Secrétariat du Corpus SCO, 1940. (CSCO; vol. 116. Scryptores syri; t. 63).

Theodorus Mopsuestenus.Commentarius in Ioelem // Theodori Mopsuesteni Commentarius in XII prophetas / ed. H. N. Sprenger. Weisbaden: Otto Harassowitz, 1977. (Göttinger Orientforschungen V: Biblica et Patristica; Bd. 1). S. 79–104.

Theodorus Mopsuestenus.Commentarius in Jonam // Theodori Mopsuesteni Commentarius in XII prophetas / ed. H. N. Sprenger. Weisbaden: Otto Harassowitz, 1977. (Göttinger Orientforschungen V: Biblica et Patristica; Bd. 1). S. 169–190.

Theodorus Mopsuestenus.Commentarius in Malachiam // Theodori Mopsuesteni Commentarius in XII prophetas / ed. H. N. Sprenger. Weisbaden: Otto Harassowitz, 1977. (Göttinger Orientforschungen V: Biblica et Patristica; Bd. 1). S. 401–430.

Theodorus Mopsuestenus.Commentarius in Zachariam // Theodori Mopsuesteni Commentarius in XII prophetas / ed. H. N. Sprenger. Weisbaden: Otto Harassowitz, 1977. (Göttinger Orientforschungen V: Biblica et Patristica; Bd. 1). S. 319–400.

Theodorus Mopsuestenus. In epistulam ad Ephesios // Theodori episcopi Mopsuesteni in epistolas b. Pauli commentarii / ed. H. B. Sweet. Vol. I. Cambridge: At the University Press, 1880. P. 112–196.

Theodorus Mopsuestenus. In Hebreos // Pauluskommentare aus der griechischen Kirche / hrsg. K. Staab. Münster in Westfalen: Aschendorff, 1933. (Neutestamentliche Abhandlungen; Bd. 15). S. 200:12 — 212.

Theodorus Mopsuestenus. In psalmum II // Devreesse R. Le Commentaire de Théodore de Mopsueste sur les Psaumes I–LXXX. Città del Vaticano: Biblioteca apostolica Vaticana, 1939. (Studi e testi; t. 93). P. 7:10 — 16:21.

Theodorus Mopsuestenus. In psalmum VIII // Devreesse R. Le Commentaire de Théodore de Mopsueste sur les Psaumes I–LXXX. Città del Vaticano: Biblioteca apostolica Vaticana, 1939. (Studi e testi; t. 93). P. 42 — 49:16.

Theodorus Mopsuestenus. In psalmum XIII // Devreesse R. Le Commentaire de Théodore de Mopsueste sur les Psaumes I–LXXX. Città del Vaticano: Biblioteca apostolica Vaticana, 1939. (Studi e testi; t. 93). P. 78:21 — 86:21.

Theodorus Mopsuestenus. In psalmum XXXIX // Devreesse R. Le Commentaire de Théodore de Mopsueste sur les Psaumes I–LXXX. Città del Vaticano: Biblioteca apostolica Vaticana, 1939. (Studi e testi; t. 93). P. 244:5 — 253:13.

Theodorus Mopsuestenus. In psalmum XLIV // Devreesse R. Le Commentaire de Théodore de Mopsueste sur les Psaumes I–LXXX. Città del Vaticano: Biblioteca apostolica Vaticana, 1939. (Studi e testi; t. 93). P. 277:7 — 299.

Theodorus Mopsuestenus. In psalmum LXVII // Devreesse R. Le Commentaire de Théodore de Mopsueste sur les Psaumes I–LXXX. Città del Vaticano: Biblioteca apostolica Vaticana, 1939. (Studi e testi; t. 93). P. 428:5 — 447:6.

Theodorus Mopsuestenus. In Romanos // Pauluskommentare aus der griechischen Kirche / hrsg. K. Staab. Münster in Westfalen: Aschendorff, 1933. (Neutestamentliche Abhandlungen; Bd. 15). S. 113 — 172:15.

Корсунский И. Н. Теория аккомодации в отношении к вопросу о новозаветном толковании Ветхого Завета // ЧОЛДП. 1877. Cентябрь–декабрь. С. 371–376.

Collins J. J. The Psalms and Song of Songs // Collins J. J.Intoduction to the Hebrew Bible. Minneapolis (Minn.): Fortress Press, 22014. P. 483–506.

Devreesse R. Essai sur Théodore de Mopsuest. Vaticano: Bibliotheca Vaticana, 1948. (Studi e Testi; t. 141).

ESV Study Bible: English Standard Version. Wheaton (Ill.): Crossway, 2008.

Guinot J.-N. La cristallisation d’un différend: Zorobabel dans l’exégèse de Théodore de Mopsueste et de Théodoret de Cyr // Augustinianum. 1984. Vol. 24. P. 527–547.

Guinot J.-N. La typologie comme technique herméneutique // Cahiers de Biblia Patristica. 1989. Vol. 2. P. 1–34.

Hill R. C. Theodore of Mopsuestia, Interpreter of the Prophets // Sacris Erudiri. 2001. Vol. 40. P. 107–129.

McLeod F. G. Theodore of Mopsuestia. London; New York (N. Y.): Routledge, 2009.

Pappas H. S. Theodore of Mopsuestia’s Commentary on Psalm 44 (LXX): A Study of Exegesis and Christology // Greek Orthodox Theological Review. 2002. Vol. 47. P. 55–79.

Schäublin C. Untersuchungen zu Methode und Herkunft der Antiochenischen Exegese. Köln; Bonn: Peter Hanstein Verlag, 1974. (Theophaneia; Bd. 23).

Simonetti M. Lettera e/o allegoria. Roma: Augustinianum, 1985. (Studiaephemeridis «Augustinianum»; vol. 23).

Ζαχαροπουλος Δ. Θεόδορος ὁ Μοψουεστίας ὡς ἑρμηνευτὴς τῶν Γραφῶν. Ἀθήνα: Ἄρτος Ζωῆς, 1999.

Published

2023-11-13

How to Cite

(1)
Timofeev Б. Some Aspects of the Interpretation of the Old Testament Prophecies in the New Testament: The View of Theodore of Mopsuestia. БВ 2023, 18-41.

Issue

Section

Biblical studies

Categories

Most read articles by the same author(s)