Joachim Wach and the Phenomenological Tradition in the Religious Studies

Authors

  • Samarina Tatiana S. Russian Academy of Sciences

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31802/GB.2021.41.2.015

Keywords:

Joachim Wach, religious studies, phenomenology of religion, philosophy of religion, Mircea Eliade, Rudolf Otto, Friedrich Heiler, William James, Ultimate Reality, Sacred, Numinous

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to determine the place of Joachim Wach (1898–1955) in the tradition of phenomenology of religion. For this purpose, the reconstruction of the conceptual foundations of his religious system and the philosophical analysis of his theory of religious experience are carried out, the sociological and religious elements are analyzed, the legacy of Wach is compared with the works of the classics of the German phenomenology of religion, R. Otto and F. Heiler. The article shows the proximity of this theory to the concentric model, proposed by F. Heiler, but Heiler’s system was dissected and used by Wach in favor of the fashionable trend of sociological research. In his description of the center of religion J. Wach completely relied on the concept of numinous by R. Otto. Wach is convinced that there is a numinous feeling inherent in the very essence of man, which is activated when man faced with Ultimate reality, Holy or Numinous. The dialogical relations of man and Ultimate reality are the foundation of the Wach’s method of religious studies. At the same time, the process of religious experience itself more closely resembles with religious experience in the terms of W. James.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Samarina Tatiana S., Russian Academy of Sciences

PhD in Philosophy, Senior Research Fellow Institute of Philosophy at the Russian Academy of Sciences

Goncharnaya Str. 12/1, Moscow 109240, Russian Federation

t_s_samarina@bk.ru

References

Источники

Вах И. Социология религии. Часть I. «Методологические пролегомены»// Социология религии: классические подходы. Хрестоматия / под науч. ред. Μ. П. Тапочки, Ю. А. Кимелева. М.: ИНИОН РАН, 1994. С. 212-259.

Джеймс У. Многообразие религиозного опыта. М.: Наука, 1993.

Отто Р. Священное. Об иррациональном в идее божественного и его соотношении с рациональным / пер. с нем. А. М. Руткевича. СПб.: Изд. СПбГУ, 2008.

HeilerF. Das Gebet: Eine religionsgeschichtliche und religionspsychologische Untersuchung. München: Verlag von Emst Reinhardt, 1920.

HeilerF. Erscheinungsformen und Wesen der Religion. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 1961.

Kristensen W. B. The Meaning of Religion. The Hague: M. Nijhoff, I960.

Otto R. Kantisch-FriesBsche Religionsphilosophie und ihre Anwendung auf die Theologie: zur Einleitung in die Glaubenslehre für Studenten der Theologie. Tübingen: J. С. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), 1909.

Wach J. Einführung in die Religionssoziologie. Tübingen: Mohr, 1931.

Wach J. Religionswissenschaft: Prolegomena zu ihrer wissenschaftstheoretischen Grundlegung. Leipzig: L. C. Hinrichs’sche Buchhandlung, 1924.

Wach J. Sociology of Religion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1944.

Wach J. The Comparative Study of Religions. New York: Columbia University Press, 1958.

Wach J. Types of Religious Experience: Christian and Non-Christian. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1951.

Wach /., Kitagawa /. M, Alles G. D. Essays in the History of Religions. New York: Macmillan, 1988.

Литература

Забияко А. П. Феноменология религии (статья вторая)//Религиоведение. 2011. № 1. С. 114-126.

Козлова И. Л. Религиоведческая концепция Иоахима Ваха в контексте современных проблем академического религиоведения: Диссертация на соискание ученой степени кандидата философских наук. М., 2018.

Маяцкий М. Спор о Платоне: Круг Штефана Георге и немецкий университет. М.: Издательский дом Высшей школы экономики, 2012.

Самарина Т. С. Религиоведческая система М. Элиаде: феноменология религии или политика мифа? // БВ. 2021. № 1 (40). С. 284-301.

Тейвз Э. Религиозный опыт / пер. с англ, и примеч. Т. В. Малевич. 29.11.2012. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://religious.life/2012/ll/religious-experience/ (дата обращения: 10.03.2021).

Шохин В. К. Философская теология: канон и вариативность. СПб.: Нестор-История, 2018.

HartH. [Review] WachJ. SociologyofReligion//SocialForces.May 1945.Vol.23.No.4.P. 476-477.

Johnson L. T. Religious Experience in Earliest Christianity: A Missing Dimension in New Testament Studies. Minneapolis (MN): Fortress Press, 1998.

Kippenberg H. G. Joachim Wach Between the George Circle and Weber’s Typology of Religious Communities // Hermeneutics, Politics, and the History of Religions: The Contested Legacies of Joachim Wach and Mircea Eliade / ed. С. K. Wedemeyer, W. Doniger. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010. P. 3-20.

The New Testament in Christian Spirituality in The Blackwell Companion to Christian Spirituality / ed. A. Holder. Oxford: Wiley and Sons, 2011.

Wallace B. Snatched into Paradise (2 Cor 12:1-10): Paul’s Heavenly Journey in the Context of Early Christian Experience. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2011.

Wedemeyer К. Introduction I: Two Scholars, а «School» and a Conference // Hermeneutics, Politics, and the History of Religions: The Contested Legacies of Joachim Wach and Mircea Eliade / eds. С. K. Wedemeyer, W. Doniger. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.

Published

2021-08-24

How to Cite

(1)
Samarina Т. С. Joachim Wach and the Phenomenological Tradition in the Religious Studies. БВ 2021, 313-328.

Issue

Section

Religious Studies

Categories