Documentary Hypothesis of the Origin of the Pentateuch in the Works of Erhard Blum

Authors

  • Khangireev Ilya A. Orthodox St Tikhon’s University of Humanities

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31802/GB.2021.3.41.001

Keywords:

Bible studies, Bible criticism, documentary hypothesis, Erhard Blum, Elohist, Yahwist, priestly codex, deuteronomical history, linguistic dating

Abstract

The article examines the works of the modern German biblical scholar Erhard Blum, devoted to the analysis of the history and contemporary state of the documentary hypothesis of the origin of the Pentateuch, which is still dominant in modern Western biblical studies. An introduction to the article contains a brief history of the documentary hypothesis. Further in the text, the contemporary state of the hypothesis is represented by the description of Blum, with three main directions of its development, which he distinguishes, and his critical assessment of its problems and prospects. The author considers Blum’s reasoning about the problems of linguistic dating, which is important for various aspects of modern biblical studies, including the documentary hypothesis. As an example, the linguistic dating of Genesis 24 (the marriage of Isaac), made by the Israeli biblical scholar Alexander Rofe, is described, and its critical analysis is given. The author reasons about the modern critical assessment of the documentary hypothesis based on the analysis of Blum’s works, and applies his own interpretations. The author presumes that the history of the documentary hypothesis and its current state clearly demonstrates controversy. Meanwhile, opinions on the origin of the Pentateuch, alternative to the traditional church views, should not necessarily contradict the church doctrine and may be useful for identifying and solving some problems of the biblical text. Due to the fact that Blum is a contemporary biblical scholar, his person, as far as the author knows, has not been an object of academic research yet, and the present article can be considered the first in this area, and the author, therefore, is forced to rely solely on Blum’s works.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Khangireev Ilya A., Orthodox St Tikhon’s University of Humanities

Head of Department of Science and Academic Administration at the
Faculty of Theology at the Orthodox St Tikhon’s University of Humanities
6/1 Likhov per., Moscow 127051, Russian Federation

References

Astruc J. Conjectures sur les memoires originaux dont il paroit que Moyse s’est servi pour composer le livre de la Genese. Paris [Though Marked as Bruxelles]: Impr. de Fricx, 1753.

Blum E. The Literary Connection Between the Books of Genesis and Exodus and the End of the Book of Joshua // A Farewell to the Yahwist? The Composition of the Pentateuch in Recent European Interpretation / ed. T. B. Dozeman, K. Schmid. Atlanta (GA): SBL, 2006. (SBL Symposium Series; vol. 34). P. 89–106.

Blum E. Das exilische deuteronomistische Geschichtswerk // Das deuteronomistische Geschichtswerk / hrsg. H.-J. Stripp. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang GmbH; Internationaler Verlag der Wissenschaften, 2011. (ÖBS; Bd. 39). S. 269–295.

Blum E. Pentateuch — Hexateuch — Enneateuch? Or: How Can One Recognize a Literary Work in the Hebrew Bible? // Pentateuch, Hexateuch, or Enneateuch? Identifying Literary Works in Genesis Through Kings / ed. Th. Dozeman, Th. Römer, K. Schmied. Atlanta (GA): SBL, 2011. (SBL — Ancient Israel and Its Literature; vol. 8). P. 43–71.

Blum E. Die Entstehungsgeschichte der Mosetora. Fragestellungen und Tendenzen der neueren Forschung // ZPT. 2015. Bd. 2. S. 163–178.

Blum E. Noch einmal: das literargeschichtliche Profil der P-Überlieferung // Abschied von der Priesterschrift?: Zum Stand der Pentateuchdebatte / hrsg. F. Hartenstein. Leipzig: Evangelische Verlagsanstalt, 2015. (VWGTh; Bd. 40). S. 32–64.

Blum E. The Linguistic Dating of Biblical Texts. An Approach with Methodological Limitations // The Formation of Pentateuch. Bridging the Academic Cultures of Europe, Israel, and North America / ed. J. C. Gertz, B. M. Levinson, D. Rom-Shiloni, K. Schmid. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2016. P. 303–325.

Eichhorn J. G. Einleitung in das Alte Testament. Leipzig: Weidmanns, 1780–1783. Bd. 1–3.

Wellhausen J. Prolegomena zur Geschichte Israels. Berlin: G. Reimer, 1883.

Wette W. M. L. de. Die Schriften des Alten Testaments. Heidelberg: Mohr und Zimmer, 1809. Bd. 1.

Witter H. B. Jura Israelitarum in Palestinam terram Chananaeam; Commentatione in Genesin. Hildesiae, 1711.

Велльгаузен Ю. Введение в историю Израиля / пер. с нем. Н. М. Никольского. СПб.: Тип. Ю. Н. Эрлих, 1909.

Андреев А. В. «Поиск исторического Иисуса» как исследовательская традиция в зарубежном религиоведении: становление, методологические установки, актуальные подходы. Дисс. на соискание степени к. филос. н. МГУ им. М. В. Ломоносова. М., 2019.

Давыденков О., прот. Догматическое богословие. М.: ПСТГУ, 2020.

Лаврентьев А. В. Критика Документальной гипотезы и проблема происхождения

Пятикнижия в теоретических разработках Рольфа Рендторффа // БХД. 2020. Т. 4. С. 118–137.

Лаврентьев А. В. Наследие Мартина Нота в рамках текстологических и литературно-критических исследований Пятикнижия // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия I: Богословие. Философия. 2020. Вып. 89. С. 29–47.

Скобелев М. А. Происхождение Пятикнижия: традиция и документальная гипотеза // БВ. 2019. № 1 (32). С. 39–51.

Скобелев М. А., Хангиреев И. А. Юлиус Велльгаузен и Герман Гункель: методология библейского исследования // БВ. 2019. № 2 (33). С. 17–37.

Фридман И. Умберто Кассуто как критик документальной гипотезы происхождения Пятикнижия // БВ. 2019. № 4 (35). С. 17–37.

Хангиреев И. А. Документальная гипотеза происхождения Пятикнижия в творчестве Герхарда фон Рада // БВ. 2020. № 3 (38). С. 47–70.

Эйделькинд Я. Д. Песнь песней. Перевод и филологический комментарий к главам 1–3. М.: РГГУ, 2015.

Aurelius E. Zukunft jenseits des Gerichts: Eine redaktionelle Studie zum Enneateuch. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter, 2003. (BZAW; Bd. 319).

Donner H. Die literarische Gestalt der alttestamentlichen Josephsgeschichte. Heidelberg: Carl Winter, 1976.

Hurvitz A. Linguistic Study of the Relationship Between the Priestly Source and the Book of Ezekiel: A New Approach to an Old Problem. Paris: Peeters Pub and Booksellers, 1982.

Kratz R. G. Die Komposition der erzählenden Bücher des Alten Testaments. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht, 2000.

Levin C. Der Jahwist. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht, 1993. (FRLANT; Bd. 157).

Rofé A. An Enquiry into the Betrothal of Rebekah (Gen 24) // Die Hebräische Bibel und ihre zweifache Nachgeschichte: Festschrift für Rolf Rendtorff zum 65. Geburtstag / hrsg. E. Blum et al. Neukirchen-Vluyn: Neukirchener Verl., 1990. S. 27–39.

Published

2021-09-15

How to Cite

(1)
Khangireev И. А. Documentary Hypothesis of the Origin of the Pentateuch in the Works of Erhard Blum. БВ 2021, 17-36.

Issue

Section

Biblical studies

Categories