Problematic Issues of Christology in Dialogue with Non-Chalcedonian Churches. Notes on the Second Agreed Statement. Part II
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31802/GB.2021.40.1.006Keywords:
Christology, two natures in Christ, St. Cyril of Alexandria, Theodorite of Cyrus, Council of Chalcedon, non-Chalcedonites, Mixed Commission, ChambesyAbstract
The publication completes the theological analysis of the «Second Agreed Statement of the Mixed Commission on Theological Dialogue between the Orthodox Church and the Eastern Orthodox Churches» (Chambesi, 1990) («Statement»). The second part examines the use in the «Statement» of the expression: «one nature of God the Word incarnate» (μία φύσις τοῦ Θεοῦ Λόγου σεσαρκωμένη). Attention is drawn to its different understanding among Orthodox and moderate Monophysites, and it is noted that the «Statement» does not specify in what sense it should be understood. Further, the question of the natural wills and actions of Christ is considered and it is indicated that in the «Statement» in this matter a departure from the teachings of the VI Ecumenical Council is allowed. Then there is a talk about the status of the Ecumenical Councils, attention is drawn to the declaration of the «Statement» about the common Christological faith of the Orthodox and non-Chalcedonian Churches and to the readiness expressed in it to abolish the ancient council anathemas. The groundlessness and inadmissibility of these statements is noted due to the contradiction with the Tradition of the Orthodox Church. Finally, a general conclusion is made about the unsatisfactory nature of the «Statement» and about the impossibility of using it as a basis for theological dialogue.
Downloads
References
Источники
Athanasius Alexandrinus. Homilia in illud: Nunc anima mea turbata est (CPG 2161) // ACO. II 2, 2, 2. P. 658–662.
Cyrillus Alexandrinus. Epistula 4 (CPG 5304) // ACO. 1, 1, 1. P. 25–28.
Cyrillus Alexandrinus. Epistula 39 (CPG 5339) // ACO. 1, 1, 4. P. 15–20.
Cyrillus Alexandrinus. Epistula 46 (CPG 5346) // ACO. 1, 1, 6. P. 157–162.
Cyrus Alexandrinus. Satisfactio facta inter Cyrum et eos qui errant ex parte Theodosianum (CPG 7613) // ACO. II 2, 2. P. 594–600.
Concilium Chalcedonense (451). Actio V. Definitio fidei // ACO. 2, 1, 2. P. 126–130.
Concilium CPolitanum II (553). Actio VIII (CPG 9362). Canones // ACO. 4, 1. P. 240–245.
Concilium CPolitanum III (681). Actio XVIII (CPG 9436). Symbolum // ACO. II 2, 2, 2. P. 768–776.
Doctrina partum de incarnatione Verbi. Ein griechisches Florilegium aus der Wende des 7. und 8. Jahrhunerts / hrsg. F. Diekamp. Münster, 1907 (r1981).
Drei dogmatische Schriften Iustinians / hrsg. E. Schwartz [ABAW NF; Heft 18]. München: Verlag der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1939.
Joint Commission of the Theological Dialogue Between the Orthodox Church and the Oriental Orthodox Churches. Second Agreed Statement. Orthodox Center of the Ecumenical Patriarchate Chambesy, Geneva, Switzerland. September 23–28, 1990. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://orthodoxjointcommission.wordpress.com/2013/12/14/second-agreed-statement-1990/ (дата обращения 23.03.21).
Justinianus. Contra Monophysitas (CPG 6878) // Drei dogmatische Schriften Iustinians / hrsg. E. Schwartz [ABAW NF. Heft 18]. München: Verlag der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1939. S. 7–43.
Maximus Confessor. Epistula 12 (CPG 7699) // PG. T. 91. Col. 460 A–509 B.
Paulus II CPolitanus. Typus (CPG 7621) // ACO. II 1. P. 208–210.
Photius. Bibliothèque. T. 4 («Codices» 223–229) / éd. R. Henry. Paris: Les belles lettres, 1965.
Photius. Bibliothèque. T. 5 («Codices» 230–241) / éd. R. Henry. Paris: Les belles lettres, 1967.
Sergius CPolitanus. Ecthesis Heraclii imperatoris (CPG 7607) // ACO. II 1. P. 156–162.
Synodus Lateranensis (649). Secretariatus IV (CPG 9401) Symbolum apud Ephesum // ACO. II 1. P. 218–223.
Synodus Lateranensis (649). Secretariatus V (CPG 9402). Symbolum. Canones // ACO. II 1. P. 364–389.
The Nature of Christ by His Holiness Pope Shenouda III. Cairo, 21991.
Ὁ Θεολογικὸς Διάλογος Ὀρθοδόξων καὶ Ἀντιχαλκιδονίων (παρελθών — παρόν — μέλλον): μία ἁγιορειτικὴ συμβολή. Ἅγιον Ὅρος: Ἱερὰ Μονὴ Ὁσίου Γρηγορίου, 2018.
Богословский диалог между Православной церковью и Восточными православными церквами / cост. и ред. К. Шайо, пер. с англ. К. Бурмистров. М.: ББИ, 2001.
Литература
Jugie M. Monophysisme // DTC. 1929. Vol. 10. Col. 2216–2251.
Lebon J. Le monophysisme sévérien: Étude historique, littéraire et théologique sur la résistance monophysite au concile de Chalcedoine jusqu’à la constitution de l’Église Jacobite. [Louvain: Universitas Catholica Lovanensis, 1909] New-York: AMS Press, r1978.
Loon H. The Dyophysite Christology of Cyril of Alexandria. Leiden; Boston: Brill, 2009.
Вселенские Соборы. М.: ЦНЦ РПЦ «Православная энциклопедия», 2005.
Давыденков О., прот. Христологическая система умеренного монофизитства и её место в истории византийской богословской мысли. М.: ПСТГУ, 2020.
Ларше Ж.-К. Христологический вопрос (по поводу проекта соединения Православной Церкви с Дохалкидонскими Церквами: нерешенные богословские и экклезиологические проблемы) / пер. с франц. иером. Саввы (Тутунова) // БТ. № 41. 2007. С. 146–211.
Феодор (Юлаев), иером. Монофелитство. Монофизитство // ПЭ. 2017. Т. 46. С. 672–696.
