The Representation of Classical Views on the Atonement in Radical Feminist Theology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31802/PWG.2021.6.2.006Keywords:
Atonement, feminist theology, satisfaction theory, moral influence theory, organic theory, sin, will of GodAbstract
The article examines some of the arguments of modern radical feminist theologians who criticize a number of classical theories of atonement, such as the satisfaction theory, the moral influence theory, and the theory of G. Aulen, which is a modern variation of the recapitulation view by St. Irenaeus of Lyons. The author examines critical remarks by feminist theologians, which are poorly known in Russian theology: R. R. Ruther, R. N. Brock, D. K. Brown, and others. The article considers the question of general and particular objections to the above views of the work of Christ which is to be called ‘atonement’. Finally, the author makes a number of critical remarks about claims directed against the classical views on atonement and demonstrates the extreme subjectivity of these claims.
Downloads
References
Адриан (Пашин), игум. Главное христологическое произведение преподобного Анастасия Синаита «Путеводитель». СПб.: СПбДА, 2018.
Ансельм Кентерберийский. Почему Бог стал человеком // Искупление: материалы II Международного симпозиума христианских философов / ред. Н. Печерская. СПб.: ВРФШ, 1999. С. 20–136.
Афанасий Великий, свт. Cлoвo o воплощении Бога-слова и o пришествии Его к нам во плоти // Восточные отцы и учители церкви IV в.: антология: в 3 т. / ред. иером. Иларион (Алфеев). М.: МФТИ, 1998. Т. 1. С. 28–70.
Бирюков Д. С. Арий // Антология восточно-христианской богословской мысли: ортодоксия и гетеродоксия: в 2 т. / ред. Г. И. Беневич, Д. С. Бирюков. Т. 1. М.; СПб.: Никея; РХГА, 2009. С. 116–139.
Григорий Нисский, свт. К Авлавию, о том, что не «три Бога» // Творения. Сергиев Посад: Тип. В. Готье, 1862. Ч. 4. (ТСО; т. 40). С. 111–132.
Давыденков О., прот. Догматическое богословие. М.: ПСТГУ, 2017.
Каспер В. Иисус Христос. М.: ББИ, 2005.
Лосский В. Н. Очерк мистического богословия Восточной Церкви. Догматическое богословие. Сергиев Посад: СТСЛ, 22012.
Орлов И. А. Труды св. Максима Исповедника по раскрытию догматического учения о двух волях во Христе: историко-догматическое исследование. Краснодар: Текст, 2010.
Орлова Н. Х. О чем молчал Адам: гендерное измерение христианской антропологии. СПб.: Дмитрий Буланин, 2012.
Толстова С. С. Женщина и церковь: постановка проблемы. Ростов-на-Дону: Профпресс, 2014.
Basilus Magnus. Homilia in Psalmum XLVIII // PG. T. 29. Col. 431–460.
Brock R. N. Journeys by Heart: A Christology of Erotic Power. New York (N.Y.): Crossroad, 1988.
Brock R. N. And a Little Child Will Lead Us: Christology and Child Abuse // Christianity, Patriarchy, and Abuse: A Feminist Critique / ed. J. C. Brown, C. R. Bohn. New York (N.Y.): Pilgrim Press, 1989. P. 42–61.
Brock R. N., Parker R. A. Proverbs of Ashes: Violence, Redemptive Suffering, and the Search for What Saves Us. Boston (Mass.): Beacon Press, 2002.
Brock R. N. The Сross of Resurrection and Communal Redemption // Cross Examinations: Readings on the Meaning of the Cross Today / ed. M. Trelstad. Minneapolis (Minn.): Fortress Press, 2006. P. 241–251.
Brown J. C., Parker R. For God so Loved the World? // Christianity, Patriarchy, and Abuse: A Feminist Critique / ed. J. C. Brown, C. R. Bohn. New York (N.Y.): Pilgrim Press, 1989. P. 1–30.
Brown J. C. Divine Child Abuse? // Daughters of Sarah. 1992. Vol. 18. No. 3. P. 24–28.
Buck J. M. Feminist Philosophical Theology of the Atonement // Feminist Theology. 2020. No. 3. P. 239–250.
Daly M. Beyond God the Father: Towards a Philosophy of Women’s Liberation. Boston (Mass.): Beacon, 1985.
Grant J. Come to My Help, Lord, For I’m In Trouble: Womanist Jesus and the Mutual Struggle for Liberation // Reconstructing the Christ Symbol: Essays in Feminist Christology / ed. M. Stevens. New York (N.Y.); Mahwah (N.J.): Paulist Press, 1994. P. 54–71.
Gregorius Theologus. Oratio XLV, in sanctum Pasсha // PG. T. 36. Col. 623–664.
Heyward C. Saving Jesus from Those Who Are Right: Rethinking What It Means to Be Christian. Minneapolis (Minn.): Fortress Press, 1999.
Hopkins J. M. Towards a Feminist Christology: Jesus of Nazareth, European Women, and the Christological Crisis. Grand Rapids (Mich.): W. B. Eerdmans Publ. Company, 1994.
Houts M. G. Classical Atonement Imagery: Feminist and Evangelical Challenges // Catalyst. 1993. No. 3. P. 1–5.
Johnson E. A. She Who Is: The Mystery of God in Feminist Theological Discourse. New York (N.Y.): Crossroad, 1992.
Love G. A. In Search of a Non-violent Atonement Theory: Are Abelard and Girard a Help, or a Problem? // Theology as Conversation: The Significance of Dialogue in Historical and Contemporary Theology / ed. B. McCormack, K. J. Bender. Grand Rapids (Mich.): W. B. Eerdmans Publ. Company, 2009. P. 194–214.
Maximus Confessor. Opuscula theologica et polemica ad Marinum // PG. T. 91. Col. 9–286.
Nessan C. L. Violence and Atonement // Dialog. 1996. No. 35. P. 26–34.
Peacore L. D. The Role of Women's Experience in Feminist Theologies of Atonement. Eugene (Ore.): Pickwick Publications, 2010.
Piper J., Grudem W. Recovering Biblical Manhood and Womanhood: A Response to Evangelical Feminism. Wheaton (Ill.): Crossway, 2006.
Ray D. K. Deceiving the Devil: Atonement, Abuse, and Ransom. Cleveland (Ohio): Pilgrim Press, 1998.
Ruether R. R. Introducing Redemption in Christian Feminism. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1998.
Van Dyk L. Do Theories of Atonement Foster Abuse? // Dialog. 1996. No. 35. P. 21–25.
Weaver J. D. Violence in Christian Theology // CrossCurrents. 2001. Vol. 51. No. 2. P. 150–176.
Wismer P. L. For Women in Pain: A Feminist Theology of Suffering // In the Embrace of God: Feminist Approaches to Theological Anthropology / ed. Ann O’Hara Graff. Maryknoll (N.Y.): Orbis Books, 1995. P. 138–158.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
