Contribution of bishop John of Smolensk and Dorogobuzh (Sokolov) to the development of canonical science in Russia

Authors

  • Isidore (Tupikin), metropolitan Smolensk theological seminary

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31802/2500-1450/2017-28-1-178-200

Keywords:

bishop John (Sokolov), canon law, study, method, sourses, systematization, “Experience of a course on church jurisprudence”, system, theory, practice

Abstract

In Russia, the study of church law since ancient times was associated with practical issues of the life of Christians, and did not have a special place among other sciences. Only at the end of the 18th century the Metropolitan of Moscow and Kolomna Platon (Levshin) compiled an instruction on the study of the “Pilot Book” and developed the methods of interpreting the canons contained in it. The Holy Synod saw the benefits in this initiative and decided to introduce the study of the “Pilot book” in all theological academies. Later, as a result of the reform of the theological schools in 1808, a new subject was introduced into the academic curriculum of academies - canon law. From this period began the systematic study of canon law in Russia. However, it was only after several decades that truly significant scientific works began to be published on this subject. The role of the pioneer in this case deservedly belongs to His Grace John (Sokolov). Thanks to his monograph - “Experience of a course on church jurisprudence”, published in 1851, a deep scientific analysis of the church law system was initiated. It was Bishop John who proposed the methodology of canon law, its sources and place among a number of other ecclesiastical disciplines. To fill the deficiency that existed in his own canonical system, Bishop John wrote a number of articles that were published in the jounals Christian Reading and Orthodox Interlocutor. It must be admitted that these were only the first serious steps towards the formation of a national school of church law, but it was these steps that enabled subsequent researchers to go further along the path outlined by Bishop John.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Isidore (Tupikin), metropolitan, Smolensk theological seminary

metropolitan of Smolensk and Dorogobuzhsky, rector of the Smolensk theological seminary

References

Б. А. Шульте // БЭ. 1904. Т. 40. С. 6-7.

Бердников И. С. Церковное право, как особая, самостоятельная правовая область и его отношение к общей системе права: Вступительная лекция, читанная в Императорском Казанском университете. Казань, 1885.

Бердников И. С. Дополнение к Краткому курсу церковного права православной греко-российской церкви. Казань, 1889.

Григорий (Матрусов), иерод. Каноны: правила Церкви и правила жизни. Правила и практика применения канонов первого тысячелетия в современной жизни Церкви. М., 2017.

Заозерский Н. А. Право православной Греко-восточной русской церкви как предмет специальной юридической науки. М., 1888.

Иоанн (Соколов), еп. Опыт курса церковного законоведения. СПб., 1851.

Ириней (Фальковский), архиеп. Compendium, in usum rossicae studiosae iuventutis concinnatum, atque adjectione sex ultimorum librorum iuxta delineationem eiusdem cl. Theophanis. СПб., 1802.

Ключевский В. О. Содействие церкви успехам русского гражданского права и порядка // Ключевский В. О. Церковь и Россия. P., 1969. С. 7-39

Макарий (Булгаков), митр. Введение в православное богословие. СПб., 1871.

Никодим (Милаш), еп. Православное церковное право. СПб., 1897.

Остроумов М. А. Очерк православного церковного права. Харьков, 1893.

Павлов А. С. Курс церковного права. СПб., 2002.

Сильвестр (Лебединский), архиеп. Compendium theologiae classicum didactico-polemicum, doctrinae orthodoxae christiae maxime consonum. М., 1805.

Смирнов С. К. История Московской славяно-греко-латинской академии. М., 1855.

Соколов Н. К. Из лекций по церковному праву. Система канонического права в 2 вып. М., 1875. Вып. 2.

Феофан (Прокопович), архиеп. Christianae, Orthodoxae, Dogmatico-polemicae Theologiae, olim a clarissimo viro Theophane Procopowicz eiusque continuatoribus adornatae ac in tribus voluminibus primum anno MDCCLXXXII (1782) editae, Compendium, in usum rossicae studiosae iuventutis concinnatum, atque adjectione sex ultimorum librorum iuxta delineationem eiusdem cl. Theophanis. СПб., 1802.

Феофилакт (Горский), еп. Orthodoxae orientalis ecclesiae dogmata seu doctrina christiana de credendis et agendis. СПб., 1818.

Филарет (Дроздов), свт. Собрание мнений и отзывов Филарета, митрополита Московского и Коломенского, по учебным и церковно-государственным вопросам. СПб., 1885. Т. 1, 3.

Флоровский Г., прот. Пути русского богословия. М., 2009.

Цыпин В., прот. Каноническое право. М., 2012.

Чистович И. А. История Санкт-Петербургской духовной академии. СПб., 1857.

Aidan N. Theology in the russian diaspora: Church, Fathers, Eucharist in Nikolai Afanasiev (1893-1966). New York, 1989.

Beveridge W. Synodikon, sive Pandectae сanonum ss. Apostolorum et Conciliorum ab Ecclesia Graeca receptorum. Oxonii, 1672.

Buddeus I. F. Historia Ecclesiastica Veteris Testamenti. Magdeburg, 1726.

Grdzelidze T. Church (orthodox ecclesiology) // The encyclopedia of eastern Orthodox Christianity. Vol. 1. A-M / Ed. J. A. McGuckin. Oxford, 2011. P. 124-132.

Poiret P. Oeconomia Divina. Б. м., 1728.

Published

2018-03-15

How to Cite

(1)
Tupikin И. Contribution of Bishop John of Smolensk and Dorogobuzh (Sokolov) to the Development of Canonical Science in Russia. БВ 2018, 178-200.

Issue

Section

Canonical Low

Categories