‘Euthyphron’ in the System of Dialogues of Plato’s Definition

Authors

  • Soloviev Roman S. Moscow Theological Academy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31802/2500-1450-2020-36-1-298-321

Keywords:

ancient Greek philosophy, Plato, chronology of Plato’s dialogues, dialogue «Euthyphro», dialogues in direct dramatic form, dialogues of definition

Abstract

In this article, the author seeks to rethink the chronology of the dialogue «Euthyphro», which is usually considered an early dialogue of Plato. Having shown in the previous articles the incongruities of the traditional early dating of the dialogue, the author, based on the idea of the genre evolution of Plato’s works, places the dialogue among the school ones written against the background of the compilation of the «Laws». To confirm his thesis, the author refers to the late dialogues of Plato and shows how, in terms of methodology (formalization of the definition of diaeresis, the mathematical passages of thought) «Euthyphro» approaches to such texts as «Theaetetus», «Parmenides», «Epinomis» etc. The similarity of the approaches with the «Meno» and «Epinomis», narrative proximity to «Theaetetus», school clichés, and similar to the later Platonic dialogues themes show involvement of «Euthyphro» in the problematic of the dialogues of definition. The evidence given and the affinity with the later dialogues show that the argument of «Euthyphro» really had to rely on the developed technique of conducting debates. This allows us to ground a new chronology of the dialogue «Euthyphro»: the late school dialogue, reflecting the practice of school debates of the Platonic Academy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Soloviev Roman S., Moscow Theological Academy

MA in Philology, MA in Theology, Assistant at the Department of Philology at the Moscow Theological Academy
Holy Trinity-St. Sergius Lavra, Sergiev Posad 141300, Russia

References

Aristoteles. De anima // Aristotle. De anima / ed. W. D. Ross. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1961. P. 1-338.

Aristoteles. Topica // Aristote Topiques Livres I-IV / texte établi et traduit par J. Brunschwig. Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 1967. P. 1-442.

Diogenes Laertius. Vitae philosophorum // Diogenes Laertius. Lives of eminent philosophers / ed. with introd. by Tiziano Dorandi. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013. P. 149-241.

Platonis opera. In 5 vols. / ed. by J. Burnet. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1900-1907.

Платон. Сочинения в 4 т. / под общей редакцией А. Ф. Лосева, В. Ф. Асмуса и А. А. Тахо-Годи. М.: Мысль, 1990. т. 1.

Платон. Сочинения в четырех томах / под общ. ред. А. Ф. Лосева и В. Ф. Асмуса; пер. с древнегреч. СПб.: Изд. Олега Абышко, 2007. т. 3. Ч. 2.

Платон. Парменид / Перевод, введение, комментарии, приложение, указатель имен Ю. А. Шичалина. СПб.: РХГА, 2017.

Dillon J. Review of L. Tarán, Academica: Plato, Philip of Opus and the Pseudo-Platonic Epinomis // American Journal of Philology. 1980. Vol. 101. P. 486-488.

Dorion L.-A. Euthydème et Dionysodore sont-ils des Mégariques? // Plato: Euthydemus, Lysis, Charmides, Proceedings of the V Symposium Platonicum. Selected Papers. Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag, 2000. P. 35-50.

Kahn H. Ch. Plato and the Socratic dialogues: The Philosophical Use of Literary Form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.

Slings S. R. Plato: Clitophon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.

Published

2020-02-15

How to Cite

(1)
Soloviev Р. С. ‘Euthyphron’ in the System of Dialogues of Plato’s Definition. БВ 2020, 298-321.

Issue

Section

Classic philology

Categories