Creation, Space and Time: The Insufficiency of the Observable Universe For the Origin of Living Nature. Part 3
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31802/BSCH.2025.12.3.004Keywords:
creation, six days of creation, fall, space-time, two-vector model, emergence of complex life, evolution, fitness, natural selection, genetic drift, multiverseAbstract
In the previously described two-vector model, the biblical world of creation (Gen. 1) and the observable universe are related as two states of the space-time continuum. According to the model, the «kinds» of complex organisms (Gen. 1) created by God in the original space-time, as a consequence of the Fall and the «curse of the ground» (Gen. 3, 17), ended up in the altered space-time of the observable world. The model makes a counterintuitive prediction, which contradicts the modern evolutionary paradigm, that the observable universe is insufficient for the emergence of complex life. This prediction is tested in the third part of the article by examining the scientific literature on the role of natural selection and genetic drift in the evolution of complexity. It is shown that the widespread belief that more complex organisms are also more fit is erroneous. Throughout the history of life on Earth, simple bacteria, not complex life forms, are represented by the most reproductively successful and abundant species and dominate the biosphere. The more complex the organism, the lower the maximum growth rate of individual biomass and the maximum population growth rate, as well as the greater the generation time and the burden of deleterious mutations that reduce fitness. Since mutations that increase complexity and slow growth and reproduction are slightly deleterious, they could not have been the material for the evolution of complex life forms through natural selection favoring beneficial mutations. Оn the other hand, random genetic drift, which promotes the accumulation of slightly deleterious mutations, could not lead to the emergence of beneficial adaptations in complex organisms. Thus, the origin of biological complexity cannot be explained by natural selection and genetic drift. The deficiency of theory prompts scientists to turn to an alternative evolutionary model. Scientific publications are appearing in which the authors link the emergence of complexity to random processes in a hypothetical multiverse. It is assumed that in an infinite number of universes, worlds similar to ours inevitably exist, where in populations of simple organisms, “successful” combinations of mutations were accidentally fixed that formed the genomes of complex organisms. The data and conclusions presented in these works confirm the prediction of the two-vector model about the insufficiency of the observable universe for the emergence of complex life and, therefore, support the model.
Downloads
References
Литература
Виленкин А. В. Мир множества миров. Физики в поисках иных вселенных. М.: АСТ, 2018.
Дарвин Ч. Происхождение видов путём естественного отбора, или сохранение благоприятных рас в борьбе за жизнь. СПб.: Наука, 2001.
Иваненков В. В. Шестоднев, грехопадение и время. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://bogoslov.ru/article/6192985 (дата обращения: 20.08.2024).
Кунин Е. В. Логика случая. О природе и происхождении биологической эволюции. М.: Центрполиграф, 2014. Электронная версия книги.
Мазур В. А. Инфляционная космология и гипотеза случайного самозарождения жизни //Доклады Академии Наук. 2010. Т. 431. Вып. 2. С. 183–187.
Alberts B., et al. Molecular biology of the cell. New York: Garland Science, 2008.
Bar-On Y. M., Phillips R., Milo R. The biomass distribution on Earth // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA. 2018. Vol. 115. P. 6506–6511. Supplementary materials. P. 89.
Carr B., Ellis G. Universe or Multiverse? // Astronomy & Geophysics. 2008. Vol. 49. P. 2.29–2.33.
DeLong J. P., et al. Shifts in metabolic scaling, production, and efficiency across major evolutionary transitions of life // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA. 2010. Vol. 107. P. 12941–1245.
Ellis G. F. R. Does the multiverse really exist? // Scientific American. 2011. Vol. 305. P. 39–43.
Flombaum P., et al. Present and future global distributions of the marine Cyanobacteria Prochloro coc cus and Synechococcus // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA. 2013. Vol. 110. P. 9824–9829.
Forbes A. A., Krimmel B. A. Evolution is change in the inherited traits of a population through
successive generations // Nature Education Knowledge. 2010. Vol. 3. Art. 6. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://www.nature.com/scitable/knowledge/library/evolution-ischange-in-the-inherited-traits-15164254 (дата обращения: 18.07.2024).
Futuyma D. J. Evolution. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates, 2013.
Glazier D. S. The relevance of time in biological scaling // Biology-Basel. 2023. Vol. 12. Art. 1084.
Gould S. J. The evolution of life on the Еarth // Scientific American. 1994. Vol. 271. P. 84–91.
Gould S. J. Full house: the spread of excellence from Plato to Darwin. New York: Harmony Books, 1996.
Hartl D. L., Clark A. G. Principles of population genetics. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates, 2007.
Herron J. C. AlleleA1 evolution simulation software. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://faculty.washington.edu/herronjc/a1/ (дата обращения: 19.07.2024).
Koonin E. V. Towards a postmodern synthesis of evolutionary biology // Cell Cycle. 2009. Vol. 8.P. 799–800.
Koonin E. V. Evolution of genome architecture // International Journal of Biochemistry and Cell Biology. 2009. Vol. 41. P. 298–306.
Lewontin R. C. The units of selection // Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. 1970. Vol. 1. P. 1–18.
Liu G., Mattick J. S, Taft R. J. A meta-analysis of the genomic and transcriptomic composition of complex life // Cell Cycle. 2013. Vol. 12. P. 2061–2072.
Lynch M., Conery J. S. The origins of genome complexity // Science. 2003. Vol. 302. P. 1401–1404.
Lynch M. The frailty of adaptive hypotheses for the origins of organismal complexity // Pro ceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA. 2007. Vol. 104. Suppl. 1. P. 8597–8604.
Lynch M., Trickovic B., Kempes C. P. Evolutionary scaling of maximum growth rate with organism size // Scientific Reports. 2022. Vol. 12. Art. 22586.
Lynch M. Evolutionary cell biology: the origins of cellular architecture. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2024.
Melo W. A., et al. The road to evolutionary success: insights from the demographic history of an Amazonian palm // Heredity. 2018. Vol. 121. P. 183–195.
Moody E. R. R., et al. The nature of the last universal common ancestor and its impact on the early Earth system // Nature Ecology and Evolution. 2024. Vol. 8. P. 1654–1666.
Morris R. M, et al. SAR11 clade dominates ocean surface bacterioplankton communities // Nature. 200. Vol. 420. P. 806–810.
Norris L. C., et al. Adaptive introgression in an African malaria mosquito coincident with the increa sed usage of insecticide-treated bed nets // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA. 2015. Vol. 112. P. 815–820.
Palmer M. E., Feldman M. W. Survivability is more fundamental than evolvability // PLoS One. 2012. Vol. 7. Art. e38025.
Roddy A. B., Alvarez-Ponce D., Roy S. W. Mammals with small рopulations do not exhibit larger genomes // Molecular Biology and Evolution. 2021. Vol. 38. P. 3737–3741.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.



