The Reflection of the Christological Formula “in Two Natures” (ἐν δύο φύσεσιν) in the Texts of the Sunday Octoechos
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31802/PWG.2026.15.1.003Keywords:
theology of the Council of Chalcedon, ἐν δύο φύσεσιν, ἐκ δύο φύσεων, Octoechos, hymnographyAbstract
The article examines the reflection of the Christological formula “in two natures” (ἐν δύο φύσεσιν) in the Sunday texts of the Octoechos. The analysis of the corpus for the presence of the aforementioned formula is conducted along three lines: the exact reproduction of the formula, the naming of the natures, and the indication of their number. It has been established that the hymnographers seldom resort to verbatim citation; however, the Octoechos contains texts with the exact “ἐν δύο φύσεσιν”, as well as its variants with a synonymous substitution of the numeral or with a changed word order. The doctrine of the two natures is also conveyed contextually—through the synchronous mention of the divine and human natures, or through an indication of their duality alone, without the preposition “ἐν”; in addition, the synonymous use of “φύσις” and “οὐσία,” characteristic of the era of the Chalcedonian controversies, is attested. The formula of St. Cyril “ἐκ δύο φύσεων” is not found in the Sunday texts of the Octoechos. It is concluded that the definition of faith of the Council of Chalcedon is reproduced in hymnography in several ways, and the observed diversity in the expression of the doctrine of the two natures, given the complete absence of the formula “ἐκ δύο φύσεων,” is not interpreted by the compilers as a departure from the theology of St. Cyril, all the more so since in his own works the construction “εἰς δύοφύσεις,” which is translated analogously to the Chalcedonian one, is attested.
Downloads
References
Cyrillus Alexandrinus. Glaphyrorum in Leviticum // PG. 69. Col. 13–678. Рус. пер.: Кирилл Александрийский, свт. Глафиры на книгу Левит. М.: Паломникъ, 2001.
Difinitio fidei // ACO. T. II. Vol. 1 (2). / ed. E. Schwartz. Berolini et Lipsiae: Walter de Gruyter, 1933. Р. 129-130.
Gregorius Nazianzenus. Oratio XXIX // PG. 36. Col. 74–103. Рус. пер.: Григорий Богослов, свт. Слово 29 // Творения иже во святых отца нашего Григория Богослова, архиепископа Константинопольского. Т. 1. М., Изд-во П. П. Сойкина, 1912.
Joannes Damascenus. Expositio Fidei Οrthodoxae // PG. 94. Col. 789–1228. Рус. пер.: Иоанн Дамаскин, прп. Точное изложение православной веры. М.: Индрик, 2002.
Proclus Constantinopolitanus. Homilia I de laudibus Sanctae Mariae Deiparae // ACO. T. I. Vol. 1 (1) / ed. E. Schwartz. Berolini et Lipsiae: Walter de Gruyter, 1927. S.103–107.
Severus of Antioch. Letter 6 «To Maron the reader» // A Collection of Letters of Severus of Antioch / ed. and trans. E. W. Brooks, Paris: Firmin-Didot, 1915.
Synodus Chalcedonensis. Actio III. Epistolae Cyrilli et Tomus Leonis // ACO. T. II. Vol. 1 (2). / ed. E. Schwartz. Berolini et Lipsiae: Walter de Gruyter, 1933. S. 80-81.
Παρακλητικὴ ἤτοι Ὀκτώηχος ἡ Μεγάλη, περιέχουσα πᾶσαν τὴν ἀνηκούσαν αὐτῇ ἀκολουθίαν / ἐκδ. ὑπὸ Ἀνδρέου τοῦ Ἰδρωμένου, ἐπιστ. Σπυρίδωνος Ἱερομονάχου Ζερβοῦ. Βενετία: Φοίνικος, 1858.
Вейсман А. Д. Греческо-русский словарь. 5-е изд. СПб.: Издание автора; тип. В. Безобразова и К°, 1899.
Кожухов С., диак. Каппадокийская традиция понимания термина «природа» Иоанном Грамматиком в полемике с Севиром Антиохийским // Вестник ПСТГУ. 2013. № 2. С. 34-51.
Кожухов С., диак. Халкидонский Собор, его рецепция и некоторые аспекты христологии в V — начале VI вв. // Богословский вестник. 2019. № 3. С. 67-88.
Мейендорф И., протопр. Иисус Христос в восточном православном богословии. М.: Изд. ПСТБИ, 2000.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.




