'Commentary of Ambrosiater on the Epistle of the Apostle Paul to the Ephesians’ as a Literary Work
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31802/2658-770X-2019-1-1-65-81Keywords:
Ambrosiaster, Epistle of Paul to the Ephesians, textology, Latin exegesisAbstract
The article describes the Commentary on the Epistle to the Ephesians by Ambrosiaster, a famous Latin writer of the end of the 4th century. Although the identity of this author remains mysterious, his works often attract the attention of modern foreign researchers and can be useful for the Russian reader. This study describes the features of the author’s use of words in the Commentary, the question of dating the work based on internal textual evidence, the manuscript tradition of the document and features of the biblical text commented by the Ambrosiaster.
Downloads
References
ИСТОЧНИКИ
Ambrosiastri Opera // PL. T. 17. Col. 47–536.
Ambrosiastri qui dicitur Commentarius in epistulas Paulinas / ed. H. J. Vogels. Vindobonae: Hoelder-Pichler-Tempsky, 1966–1969. (CSEL; Vol. 81.1–3).
Augustinus Hipponensis. Epistulae // S. Aureli Augustini Hipponiensis episcopi Epistulae. Pars 2: EP. 31–103 / ed. A. Goldbacher. Pragae; Vindobonae; Lipsiae: F. Tempsky G. Freytag, 1898. (CSEL; Vol. 36.2).
Kannengiesser C. Handbook of Patristic Exegesis. P. 1081.
D’Alès A. L’Ambrosiaster et Zénon de Vérone. P. 405.
Marius Victorinus. In epistulam Pauli ad Ephesios // Marii Victorini Opera. Pars 2. Opera exegetica / recensuit F. Gori. Vindobonae: Hoelder-Pichler-Tempsky, 1986. (CSEL; Vol. 83.2). P. 1–94.
Ambrosiaster Commentaries in XIII Epistulas Paulinas / transl. and. ed. by G. L. Bray. Downers Grove: IVP Academic, 2009.
Ambrosiaster’s Commentary on the Pauline Epistles: Romans / transl. S. A. Cooper, D. G. Hunter. Atlanta: SBL Press, 2017.
Библейские комментарии отцов Церкви и других авторов I–VIII вв. Новый Завет. Т. 8: Послания к Галатам, Ефесянам, Филиппийцам / пер. с англ., греч., лат., сир. под ред. М. Дж. Эдвардса; русское издание под ред. К. К. Гаврилкина. Тверь: Сибирская благозвонница, 2005.
Феофан Затворник свт. Толкование Послания ап. Павла к ефессянам. М.: Паломник, 1998.
ЛИТЕРАТУРА
Bardy G. Éditions et rééditions d’ouvrages patristiques // Revue bénédictine. 1935. Vol. 47. P. 356–380.
Baxter J. H. Ambrosiaster Quoted as “Ambrose” in 405 // Journal of Theological Studies. 1923. Vol. 24. P. 187.
Brugensis F. L. Notationes in Sacra Biblia, quibus, variantia discrepantibus exemplaribus loca, summo studio discutiuntur. Antuerpiae: ex officina Christophori Plantini, 1580.
Bussières M.-P. L’influence du synode tenu à Rome en 382 sur l’exégèse de l’Ambrosiaser // Sacris erudiri. 2006. Vol. 45. P. 107–124.
D’Alès A. L’Ambrosiaster et Zénon de Vérone // Gregorianum. 1929. Vol. 10. P. 404–409.
Hunter D. G. Marriage, Celibacy, and Heresy in Ancient Christianity: The Jovinianist Controversy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
Hunter D. G. The Significance of Ambrosiaster // Journal of Early Christian Studies. 2009. Vol. 17. P. 1–26.
Hušek V. Models of Faith: Women in Mark’s Gospel Interpreted by Jerome, Ambrose and Ambrosiaster // Eastern Theological Journal. 2016. Vol. 2. P. 9–18.
Kannengiesser C. Handbook of Patristic Exegesis: The Bible in Ancient Christianity. Vol. 2. Leiden; Boston: Brill, 2004.
Krans J. Who Coined the Name «Ambrosiaster»? // Paul, John, and Apocalyptic Eschatology. Studies in Honour of Martinus C. de Boer / ed. J. L. H. Krans et al. Leiden: Brill, 2013. (Suplements to Novum Testamentum; Vol. 149).
Lunn-Rockliffe S. Ambrosiaster’s Political Theology. Oxford; New York; Auckland [etc.]: Oxford University Press, 2007.
Moreschini C., Norelli E. Early Christian Greek and Latin Literature: A Literary History. Peabody (Mass.): Hendrickson Publishers, 2005. Vol. 2.
Mundle W. Die Exegese der paulinischen Briefe im Kommentar des Ambrosiaster: Diss. Marburg, 1919.
Riggenbach E. Die ältesten lateinischen Kommentare zum Hebräerbrief: ein Beitrag zur Geschichte der Exegese und zur Literaturgeschichte des Mittelalters. Leipzig: Deichert, 1907.
Schweizer E. Diodor von Tarsus als Exeget // Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft und die Kunde der älteren Kirche. 1941. Bd. 40. S. 33–75.
Souter A. A Study of Ambrosiaster. Cambridge: J. Armitage Robinson, 1905. (Text and Studies; Vol. 7).
Souter A. Pelagius’s Expositions of Thirteen Epistles of St. Paul. Cambridge (Mass.): University Press, 1926. (Texts and Studies; Vol. 9).
Souter A. The Earliest Latin Commentaries on the Epistles of Saint Paul. Oxford, 1927.
Vosté J. M. La chronologie de l’activité littéraire de Théodore de Mopsueste // Revue biblique. 1925. Vol. 34. P. 54–81.
Алексеев А. А. Библия. IV. Переводы // ПЭ. М.: ЦНЦ «Православная энциклопедия», 2009. Т. 5. C. 120–200.
Зайцев Д. В. Амброзиастер // ПЭ. М.: ЦНЦ «Православная энциклопедия», 2001. Т. 2. C. 104–108.
Лысевич А., иер. Филологический и богословский анализ комментария Амвросиаста на Послание апостола Павла к Ефесянам: Маг. Дисс. Сергиев Посад, 2017.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
